Web filtering with integrated parental management and reporting

ABSTRACT

A system and method for web filtering, including: generating an institutional policy dashboard that enables an institution that issued a computing device to a minor user to select a set of institutional web access policies sanctioned by the institution; generating a parental policy dashboard that enables a parent of the minor user to select to a set of parental web access policies sanctioned by the parent; filtering web content accessed by the minor user via the computing device by enforcing the parental and the institutional web access policies; and reporting to the parent a set of web accesses undertaken by the minor user via the computing device.

BACKGROUND

Institutions, e.g., schools, can issue computing devices to minor users,e.g., children attending the school. An institution can employ webfiltering to limit the web accesses that can be undertaken using theissued computing devices. For example, a school can use web filtering toblock social networking sites from being accessed using the computingdevices issued to the children attending the school. A child attending aschool can take a computing device issued by their school home or to afriend's house and still be subject to the social networking ban by theschool.

SUMMARY

In general, in one aspect, the invention relates to a web filteringmechanism. The web filtering mechanism can include: an institutionalpolicy dashboard that enables an institution that issued a computingdevice to a minor user to select a set of institutional web accesspolicies sanctioned by the institution; a parental policy dashboard thatenables a parent of the minor user to select to a set of parental webaccess policies sanctioned by the parent; and a web filter for filteringa web content accessed by the minor user via the computing device byenforcing the parental and the institutional web access policies.

In general, in another aspect, the invention relates to a method for webfiltering. The method can include: generating an institutional policydashboard that enables an institution that issued a computing device toa minor user to select a set of institutional web access policiessanctioned by the institution; generating a parental policy dashboardthat enables a parent of the minor user to select to a set of parentalweb access policies sanctioned by the parent; and filtering web contentaccessed by the minor user via the computing device by enforcing theparental and the institutional web access policies.

In general, in yet another aspect, the invention relates to a webfiltering mechanism. The web filtering mechanism can include: a webfilter for filtering a web content accessed by a minor user via acomputing device issued to the minor user by an institution; and areporting mechanism for reporting to a parent of the minor user a set ofweb accesses undertaken by the minor user via the computing device.

In general, in still another aspect, the invention relates to a methodfor web filtering. The method can include: filtering a web contentaccessed by a minor user via a computing device issued to the minor userby an institution; and reporting to a parent of the minor user a set ofweb accesses undertaken by the minor user via the computing device.

Other aspects of the invention will be apparent from the followingdescription and the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by way of example,and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanyingdrawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.

FIG. 1 shows a web filtering mechanism with integrated parentalmanagement in one or more embodiments.

FIG. 2 illustrates a parental policy dashboard in one or moreembodiments.

FIG. 3 shows a web filtering mechanism establishing a trust relationshipwith a parent before allowing the parent to control the web content fora minor user.

FIG. 4 shows one or more embodiments of a web filtering mechanism thatincludes a location module.

FIG. 5 shows how a web filtering mechanism determines which set of webaccess policies, the institutional policies or the parental policies,are to be applied to a computing device in one or more embodiments.

FIG. 6 shows one or more embodiments of a web filtering mechanism withintegrated parental reporting.

FIG. 7 illustrates an activity log in one or more embodiments.

FIG. 8 shows an activity analyzer in a reporting mechanism in one ormore embodiments.

FIG. 9 shows an urgency module in a reporting mechanism in one or moreembodiments.

FIG. 10 illustrates a method for web filtering integrated with parentalmanagement in one or more embodiments.

FIG. 11 illustrates a method for web filtering integrated with parentalreporting in one or more embodiments.

FIG. 12 illustrates a computing system upon which portions of a webfiltering mechanism or clients thereof can be implemented.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the various embodiments of thepresent disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in theaccompanying drawings. Like elements in the various figures are denotedby like reference numerals for consistency. While described inconjunction with these embodiments, it will be understood that they arenot intended to limit the disclosure to these embodiments. On thecontrary, the disclosure is intended to cover alternatives,modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spiritand scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the presentdisclosure, numerous specific details are set forth in order to providea thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will beunderstood that the present disclosure may be practiced without thesespecific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures,components, have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarilyobscure aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 1 shows a web filtering mechanism 100 in one or more embodiments.The web filtering mechanism 100 filters web communication for acomputing device 120 issued to a minor user 110 by an institution. Theinstitution that issues the computing device 120 to the minor user 110to can be a school and the minor user 110 can be a child attending theschool. The web filtering mechanism 100 can perform any kind of webfiltering, e.g., DNS filtering, search filtering, keyword filtering,etc.

The web filtering mechanism 100 includes an institutional policydashboard 152 that enables the institution that issued the computingdevice 120 to the minor user 110 to select a set of institutional webaccess policies 162. The institutional web access policies 162 are webaccess policies sanctioned by the institution that issued the computingdevice 120 to the minor user 110.

The web filtering mechanism 100 includes a parental policy dashboard 150that enables a parent 112 of the minor user 110 to select to a set ofparental web access policies 160. The parental web access policies 160are web access policies sanctioned by the parent 112.

The web filtering mechanism 100 includes a web filter 170 for filteringa web content accessed by the minor user 110 via the computing device120 by enforcing the parental web access policies 160 and theinstitutional web access policies 162. In one or more embodiments, theweb filter 170 enforces the parental web access policies 160 over theinstitutional web access policies 162 if the parental web accesspolicies 160 and the institutional web access policies 162 conflict.

In one or more embodiments, the institutional policy dashboard 152 canbe accessed by an institution admin 114 of the institution that issuedthe computing device 120 to the minor user 110. The institutional webaccess policies 162 can apply to groups that can encompass the minoruser 110, e.g. a student grade level that encompasses the minor user110. The parental web access policies 160 apply only to the minor user110.

The institution admin 114 can access the institutional policy dashboard152 via a network 140 using a client 132, e.g., a computer or mobiledevice running a web browser that accesses the web filtering mechanism100 using web protocols. The parent 112 can access the parental policydashboard 150 via the network 140 using a client 130, e.g., a computeror mobile device running a web browser.

The web filtering mechanism 100 holds the parental policy dashboard 150in the same cloud site as the institutional policy dashboard 152. As aconsequence, the parent 112 can use the client 130 to access theparental policy dashboard 150 and modify the policies sanctioned by theinstitutional that issued the computing device 120 to the minor user 110without having to install any specialized software on the client 130 ofthe parent 112.

FIG. 2 illustrates the parental policy dashboard 150 in one or moreembodiments. The parental policy dashboard 150 includes a set of contentcategories 210. In this example, the content categories 210 includesocial networking, gaming, and adult. There can be any number of contentcategories controllable via the parental policy dashboard 150 and theinstitutional policy dashboard 152.

The parental policy dashboard 150 lists the institutional web accesspolicies 162 selected by the institution admin 114 via the institutionalpolicy dashboard 152. The institutional web access policies 162 in thisexample are to deny the social networking, gaming, and adult categories.

The parental policy dashboard 150 enables the parent 112 of the minoruser 110 of the computing device 120 to override one or more of theinstitutional web access policies 162. In this example, the parent 112has selected via the parental policy dashboard 150 to allow socialnetworking and gaming but to deny the adult category.

FIG. 3 shows the web filtering mechanism 100 establishing a trustrelationship with the parent 112 before allowing the parent 112 toaccess the parental policy dashboard 150. The web filtering mechanism100 establishes a trust relationship with the parent 112 in one or moreembodiments by generating a login page accessible by the client 130 ofthe parent 112 such that the login page requires the parent 112 to loginwith a set of credentials that were issued to the minor user 110 by theinstitution that issued the computing device 120 to the minor user 110.For example, the institution admin 114 can register the login credentialissued to the minor user 110 with the web filtering mechanism 100.Thereafter, those credentials can be used by the web filtering mechanism100 to establish a trust relationship with the parent 112.

The web filtering mechanism 100 sends a respective confirmation email tothe minor user 110 and the parent 112 and the institution that issuedthe computing device 120 to the minor user 110 when the credentials ofthe minor user 110 are used to login to the web filtering mechanism 100and access the parental policy dashboard 150. The confirmation emailsenable the minor user 110 and the parent 112 and the institution thatissued the computing device 120 to detect fraudulent attempts to accessthe parental policy dashboard 150 by anyone posing as a parent.

In one or more embodiments, the web filtering mechanism 100 canestablish a trust relationship with the parent 112 by providing afunction in the institutional policy dashboard 152 that enables theinstitution admin 114 to send a link, e.g., a URL, for the parentalcontrol dashboard 150 in an email message to the parent 112. The linkcan enable the parent 112, and nobody else, to access the parentalpolicy dashboard 150.

FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of the web filtering mechanism 100 thatincludes a location module 480. The location module 480 detects acurrent geographic location of the computing device 120 and provides thecurrent geographic location to the web filter 170. The location module480 enables the web filter 170 to adapt web access policies to thecurrent geographic location of the computing device 120. In one or moreembodiments, the web filter 170 enforces the institutional web accesspolicies 162 when the geographic location of the computing device 120 isinside the institution that issued the computing device 120 to the minoruser 110 and enforces the parental web access policies 160 when thegeographic location of the computing device 120 is outside theinstitution that issued the computing device 120 to the minor user 110.

In one or more embodiments, the location module 480 determines a currentgeographic location for the computing device 120 by examining its IPaddress. For example, the location module 480 can include a list of IPaddresses associated with the institution that issued the computingdevice 120 to the minor user 110. The location module 480 can detect anIP address currently used by the computing device 120 to communicate onthe network 140 and if it is an IP address not associated with theinstitution that issued the computing device 120 then it can beconcluded that the computing device 120 is located outside of theinstitution that issued the computing device 120.

In one or more embodiments, the location module 480 determines a currentgeographic location for the computing device 120 by employing aweb-based geo-location service that analyzes messages from the computingdevice 120 to determine its geographic location. The location module 480can compare the current geographic location of the computing device 120to the geographic location of the institution that issued the computingdevice 120 to the minor user 110 to determine whether or not thecomputing device 120 is currently located inside or outside of theinstitution.

In one or more embodiments, the location module 480 determines a currentgeographic location for the computing device 120 by employing a GPSmechanism in the computing device 120. The location module 480 cancompare the current geographic location reported by the GPS mechanisminside the computing device 120 to the geographic location of theinstitution that issued the computing device 120 to the minor user 110to determine whether or not the computing device 120 is currentlylocated inside or outside of the institution.

The location detection by the location module 480 can be selected to benatively supported by the computing device 120 and one or more webbrowsers that can be run on the computing device 120. This can minimizebarriers to location-based parental controls that might otherwise beimposed on the parent 112 or the minor user 110. For example, nosoftware installation is imposed on the parent 112 to track thelocation-usage of the computing device 120 by their minor user 110 whena geo-location service or device GPS or IP tracking is used by thelocation module 480.

FIG. 5 shows how the web filtering mechanism 100 determines which set ofpolicies, the parental web access policies 160 or the institutional webaccess policies 162, are to be applied to the computing device 120 inone or more embodiments. At step 510, the web filtering mechanism 100determines a current geographic location of the computing device 120.Step 510 can include determining a precise geographic location, e.g.,using a web-based geo-location service or a GPS mechanism in thecomputing device 120, or determining a current IP address being used bythe computing device 120.

At step 520, the web filtering mechanism 100 determines whether or notthe current geographic location of the computing device 120 is outsideof the institution that issued the computing device 120 to the minoruser 110. The determination at step 520 can be based on any geographiclocation measure, e.g., latitude/longitude, street address, etc., or ona comparison between the current IP address of the computing device 120and the IP addresses associated with the institution that issued thecomputing device 120 to the minor user 110.

If the current geographic location of the computing device 120 is notoutside of the institution that issued the computing device 120 to theminor user 110 at step 520, then at step 530 the web filtering mechanism100 filters web communication for the computing device 120 by applyingthe institutional web access policies 162. Otherwise, at step 540 theweb filtering mechanism 100 filters web communication for the computingdevice 120 by applying the parental web access policies 160.

FIG. 6 shows one or more embodiments of the web filtering mechanism 100integrated with a reporting mechanism 660 including an activity log 610.The activity log 610 records a set of web accesses undertaken with thecomputing device 120. The activity log 610 can also record the currentgeographic locations of the computing device 120 when the recorded webaccesses were undertaken. The activity log 610 can be used to providereports to the parent 112 about what web sites the minor user 110 hasaccessed from what location.

The web filtering mechanism 100 can employ a geo-location service 620 todetermine the current geographic location of the computing device 120.The geo-location service 620 can obtain consent for location trackingfrom the minor user 110 before tracking the location of the computingdevice 120. The location module 480 can then at any time obtain thecurrent geographic location of the computing device 120 from thegeo-location service 620, e.g., using IP/web communication via thenetwork 140.

FIG. 7 illustrates the activity log 610 in one or more embodiments. Theactivity log 610 includes a set of records 0-n. Each record 0-n candescribe a web access undertaken by the minor user 110 via the computingdevice 120. Each record 0-n in one ore more embodiments can include acontent category C0-Cn, a street address A0-An, a starting time T0-Tn,and a duration D0-Dn. The content categories C0-Cn describe the contentbeing accessed, e.g., social network, gaming, adult, etc. The streetaddresses A0-An are the geographic locations of the computing device 120during the corresponding web accesses. The starting times T0-Tn and thedurations D0-Dn are the starting time and durations for thecorresponding web accesses.

FIG. 8 shows an activity analyzer 840 in the reporting mechanism 660 inone or more embodiments. The activity analyzer 840 generates an activityreport 850 from the information in the activity log 610. The activityanalyzer 840 can generate any type of report, table, chart, graph, etc.that depicts the information in the activity log 610. For example, theactivity analyzer 840 can generate a pie chart that depicts thepercentage of time that the minor user 110 spends on each of the contentcategories recorded in the activity log 610.

The activity analyzer 840 can generate the activity report 850 in one ormore embodiments by correlating the information in the activity log 610with information contained in a performance data store 820. Theperformance data store 820 can hold performance data pertaining to theminor user 110, e.g. test grades. The activity analyzer 840 can generateactivity reports that link test grades to web access activity logged inthe activity log 610. For example, large amounts of time logged onsocial networking before a test period can be correlated to resultingtest performance.

In one or more embodiments, the reporting mechanism 660 includes a pushnotification server 880 that can send the parent 112 the activity report850 in an email message. The push notification server 880 can regularlysend activity reports, e.g., weekly reports, so that the parent 112 cantrack how much time the minor user 110 is spending on the categoriesthat the parent 112 currently allows. The regular reports can enable theparent 112 to adjust their choices on content categories accordingly. Inone or more embodiments, activity reports can be sent to a mobile deviceof the parent 112, e.g. the client 130 or another device that runs amobile app for receiving activity reports from the push notificationserver 880.

FIG. 9 shows an urgency module 990 in the reporting mechanism 660 in oneor more embodiments. The urgency module 990 detects a potential for harmto the minor user 110 by examining the web content accessed using thecomputing device 120 and sends an urgent message to the parent 112 ifthe potential for harm is detected. The urgency module 990 obtains aninformation stream from the web filter 170 that includes text associatedwith web content accessed by the minor user 110 via the computing device120. The text from the web filter 170 can include search terms typedinto search engines, content of instant messages, text extracted fromweb sites visited by the minor user, etc. The urgency module 990examines the information stream for key words, phrases, etc., that canindicate interactions by the minor user 110 with potential predators,bullies, etc., as well as conditions that may cause the minor user 110to engage in self-harm. When the urgency module 990 detects a potentialfor harm to the minor user 110 it sends an urgent message via the pushnotification server 880 to the parent 112 informing the parent 112 ofthe potential danger. The urgent message can be a text or other instantmessage to a mobile device of the parent 112.

FIG. 10 illustrates a method for web filtering integrated with parentalmanagement in one or more embodiments. While the various steps in thisflowchart are presented and described sequentially, one of ordinaryskill will appreciate that some or all of the steps can be executed indifferent orders and some or all of the steps can be executed inparallel. Further, in one or more embodiments, one or more of the stepsdescribed below can be omitted, repeated, and/or performed in adifferent order. Accordingly, the specific arrangement of steps shown inFIGS. 10-11, and FIG. 5, should not be construed as limiting the scopeof the invention.

At step 1010, an institutional policy dashboard is generated. Theinstitutional policy dashboard enables an institution that issued acomputing device to a minor user to select a set of institutional webaccess policies sanctioned by the institution.

At step 1020, a parental policy dashboard is generated. The parentalpolicy dashboard enables a parent of the minor user to select to a setof parental web access policies sanctioned by the parent.

At step 1030, web content accessed by the minor user via the computingdevice issued by the institution is filtered by enforcing the parentaland the institutional web access policies. The parental web accesspolicies can be enforced over the institutional web access policies ifthe parental web access policies and the institutional web accesspolicies conflict at step 1030.

FIG. 11 illustrates a method for web filtering integrated with parentalreporting in one or more embodiments. At step 1110, a web contentaccessed by a minor user via a computing device issued to the minor userby an institution is filtered. At step 1120, a set of web accessesundertaken by the minor user via the computing device is reported to theparent of the minor user.

Embodiments of the invention may be implemented on a specializedcomputer system. Examples of such a computing system can include one ormore mobile devices (e.g., laptop computer, smart phone, personaldigital assistant, tablet computer, or other mobile device, gameconsole), desktop computers, servers, blades in a server chassis, or anyother type of computing device(s) that include at least the minimumprocessing power, memory, and input and output device(s) to perform oneor more embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 12 illustrates a computing system 1200 upon which portions of theweb filtering mechanism 100 or the clients 130-132 or the computingdevice 120 can be implemented. The computing system 1200 includes one ormore computer processor(s) 1202, associated memory 1204 (e.g., randomaccess memory (RAM), cache memory, flash memory, etc.), one or morestorage device(s) 1206 (e.g., a hard disk, an optical drive such as acompact disk (CD) drive or digital versatile disk (DVD) drive, a flashmemory stick, etc.), a bus 1216, and numerous other elements andfunctionalities. The computer processor(s) 1202 may be an integratedcircuit for processing instructions. For example, the computerprocessor(s) may be one or more cores or micro-cores of a processor. Thecomputing system 1200 may also include one or more input device(s),e.g., a touchscreen, keyboard 1210, mouse 1212, microphone, touchpad,electronic pen, or any other type of input device. Further, thecomputing system 1200 may include one or more monitor device(s) 1208,such as a screen (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a plasmadisplay, touchscreen, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor, projector, orother display device), external storage, input for an electricinstrument, or any other output device. The computing system 1200 may beconnected to the network 140 (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a widearea network (WAN) such as the Internet, mobile network, or any othertype of network) via a network adapter 1218.

While the foregoing disclosure sets forth various embodiments usingspecific diagrams, flowcharts, and examples, each diagram component,flowchart step, operation, and/or component described and/or illustratedherein may be implemented, individually and/or collectively, using arange of processes and components.

The process parameters and sequence of steps described and/orillustrated herein are given by way of example only. For example, whilethe steps illustrated and/or described herein may be shown or discussedin a particular order, these steps do not necessarily need to beperformed in the order illustrated or discussed. The various examplemethods described and/or illustrated herein may also omit one or more ofthe steps described or illustrated herein or include additional steps inaddition to those disclosed.

While the invention has been described with respect to a limited numberof embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of thisdisclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised whichdo not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A web filtering mechanism, comprising: aninstitutional policy dashboard that enables an institution that issued acomputing device to a minor user to select a set of institutional webaccess policies sanctioned by the institution; a parental policydashboard that enables a parent of the minor user to select to a set ofparental web access policies sanctioned by the parent; and a web filterfor filtering a web content accessed by the minor user via the computingdevice by enforcing the parental and the institutional web accesspolicies.
 2. The web filtering mechanism of claim 1, further comprisinga login mechanism that enables the parent to establish a trustrelationship by logging in using a set of credentials issued to theminor user by the institution.
 3. The web filtering mechanism of claim2, wherein the login mechanism sends a respective email to the minoruser and the parent and the institution in response to a login by theparent.
 4. The web filtering mechanism of claim 1, wherein theinstitutional policy dashboard enables the institution to send a link tothe parental policy dashboard in an email message to the parent.
 5. Theweb filtering mechanism of claim 1, further comprising a location modulefor providing a current geographic location of the computing device tothe web filter such that the web filter adapts the parental web accesspolicies and the institutional web access policies to the currentgeographic location.
 6. The web filtering mechanism of claim 5, whereinthe location module determines the geographic location in response to anIP address of the computing device.
 7. The web filtering mechanism ofclaim 5, wherein the location module determines the geographic locationusing a web-based geo-location service.
 8. The web filtering mechanismof claim 5, wherein the location module determines the geographiclocation using a GPS mechanism in the computing device.
 9. The webfiltering mechanism of claim 5, further comprising an activity log thatrecords a geographic location for each of a set of web accessesundertaken by the minor user of the computing device when outside of theinstitution.
 10. The web filtering mechanism of claim 9, furthercomprising an activity analyzer that generates an activity report forthe parent in response to the web accesses and the geographic locationsrecorded in the activity log.
 11. The web filtering mechanism of claim1, further comprising an urgency module that detects a potential forharm to the minor user by examining the web content and that sends anurgent message to the parent if the potential for harm is detected. 12.A method for web filtering, comprising: generating an institutionalpolicy dashboard that enables an institution that issued a computingdevice to a minor user to select a set of institutional web accesspolicies sanctioned by the institution; generating a parental policydashboard that enables a parent of the minor user to select to a set ofparental web access policies sanctioned by the parent; and filtering webcontent accessed by the minor user via the computing device by enforcingthe parental and the institutional web access policies.
 13. The methodof claim 12, further comprising generating a login page that enables theparent to establish a trust relationship by logging in using a set ofcredentials issued to the minor user by the institution.
 14. The methodof claim 13, further comprising sending a respective email to the minoruser and the parent and the institution in response to a login by theparent.
 15. The method of claim 12, further comprising sending a link tothe parental policy dashboard in an email message to the parent.
 16. Themethod of claim 12, further comprising detecting a current geographiclocation of the computing device and adapting the parental web accesspolicies and the institutional web access policies to the currentgeographic location.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein detecting acurrent geographic location comprises accessing a web-based geo-locationservice.
 18. The method of claim 16, further comprising logging ageographic location for each of a set of web accesses undertaken by theminor user of the computing device when outside of the institution. 19.The method of claim 18, further comprising generating an activity reportfor the parent in response to the logged web accesses and the loggedgeographic locations.
 20. The method of claim 12, further comprisingdetecting a potential for harm to the minor user by examining the webcontent and that sending an urgent message to the parent if thepotential for harm is detected.
 21. A web filtering mechanism,comprising: a web filter for filtering a web content accessed by a minoruser via a computing device issued to the minor user by an institution;and a reporting mechanism for reporting to a parent of the minor user aset of web accesses undertaken by the minor user via the computingdevice.
 22. The web filtering mechanism of claim 21, further comprisinga location module for detecting a current geographic location of thecomputing device.
 23. The web filtering mechanism of claim 22, furthercomprising a parental policy dashboard that enables the parent to selecta set of the parental web access policies such that the web filterenforces the parental web access policies when the computing device isoutside of the institution.
 24. The web filtering mechanism of claim 23,further comprising an institutional policy dashboard enables theinstitution to send a link to the parental policy dashboard in an emailmessage to the parent.
 25. The web filtering mechanism of claim 22,wherein the reporting mechanism includes an activity log that records ageographic location for each of the web accesses undertaken by the minoruser of the computing device when outside of the institution.
 26. Theweb filtering mechanism of claim 25, wherein the reporting mechanismincludes an activity analyzer that generates an activity report for theparent in response to the web accesses and the geographic locationsrecorded in the activity log.
 27. The web filtering mechanism of claim21, wherein the reporting mechanism includes an urgency module thatdetects a potential for harm to the minor user by examining the webcontent and that sends an urgent message to the parent if the potentialfor harm is detected.
 28. The web filtering mechanism of claim 21,further comprising a login mechanism that enables the parent toestablish a trust relationship by logging in using a set of credentialsissued to the minor user by the institution.
 29. The web filteringmechanism of claim 28, wherein the login mechanism sends a respectiveemail to the minor user and the parent and the institution in responseto a login by the parent.
 30. A method for web filtering, comprising:filtering a web content accessed by a minor user via a computing deviceissued to the minor user by an institution; and reporting to a parent ofthe minor user a set of web accesses undertaken by the minor user viathe computing device.
 31. The method of claim 30, further comprisingdetecting a current geographic location of the computing device.
 32. Themethod of claim 31, further comprising enforcing a set of parental webaccess policies selected by the parent when the current geographiclocation of the computing device is outside of the institution.
 33. Themethod of claim 32, further comprising sending a link to a parentalpolicy dashboard in an email message to the parent such that theparental policy dashboard enables the parent to select the parental webaccess policies.
 34. The method of claim 31, further comprisingrecording a geographic location for each of the web accesses undertakenby the minor user of the computing device when outside of theinstitution.
 35. The method of claim 34, further comprising generatingan activity report for the parent in response to the web accesses andthe geographic locations.
 36. The method of claim 30, further comprisingdetecting a potential for harm to the minor user by examining the webcontent and sending an urgent message to the parent if the potential forharm is detected.
 37. The method of claim 30, further comprisingestablishing a trust relationship by logging in using a set ofcredentials issued to the minor user by the institution.
 38. The methodof claim 37, further comprising sending a respective email to the minoruser and the parent and the institution in response to a login by theparent.